Starving the World for Power and Profit: The Global Agribusiness Model


04/05/2013 by Don Quijones

images (7)

A daily ration of bread is now beyond the reach of roughly a billion people on  planet Earth. What’s more, hunger is spreading like a pandemic, making incursions from its traditional strongholds in the global south to towns and cities across depression-hit Southern Europe. In Greece reports are growing of young children having to scrounge for food from classmates, while in Spain city dwellers have become all but enured to the daily spectacle of people of all ages, genders and walks of life rummaging in rubbish bins for a bite to eat.

Some people point to this 21st century hunger pandemic as evidence of the unsustainability of current population growth — and to an extent they’re probably right. After all, there’s only so many people that the world’s rapidly declining resources can sustain. However, as Esther Vivas of the Pompeu Fabra University’s Centre of Studies on Social Movements points out in the video below, the crude reality is that many of us continue to live in a world of food abundance.

The problem of world hunger, she says, is the result of the acute inefficiencies of a global agribusiness model geared purely at generating ever larger profits for the handful of businesses that now control the global food chain. Tragically, all too often the human cost is measured in the lives of those who don’t have enough money to pay the rapidly escalating prices of basic foodstuffs. And it’s a heavy cost indeed: according to some estimates, one person dies of hunger every 8-12 seconds.

Vivas offers sharp insights on a global industry that prioritizes, at pretty much every turn, profits and power over human welfare. Unfortunately, the video is only available in Spanish and without English subtitles, so for those of you whose linguistic talents don’t quite extend to the Spanish tongue, here’s a brief summary of the highlights:

Supermarket Dominance  

Like most countries, the food distribution, wholesale and retail channels in Spain are dominated by a handful of supermarket chains which, through their oligopolistic structures, are able to more or less dictate what people eat, how much they pay for their food and how much farmers receive for their produce. Needless to say, it is a model that is wiping out small local farmers throughout Europe and the U.S., as well as leaving a terrible toll on the environment due to the vast distances much of our food has to travel before reaching our plates.

Food Speculation

The same people who kindly brought us the subprime crisis and the resultant Great Recession are now speculating vast quantities of money on the price of basic foods on the international commodity exchanges. As a result, the prices on these exchanges are no longer determined by real-world conditions of supply and demand but rather by the financial interests and whims of a small but extremely powerful group of big banks and hedge funds, many of whom have been gorging at the trough of taxpayer largesse for the last five years (for more information on the financialisation revolution, read this).

The Fatal Cost of Price Shocks

In countries like Ethiopia and Somalia, the price of essential foodstuffs more than doubled in the space of just a couple of months in the summer of 2011. In these countries many families spend as much as 80 percent of their disposable income on food, so when the price doubles, they go without.

The Famine Myth

Whenever famines take place, the media tends to pin the blame on meterological problems, droughts or war, often ignoring the elephant in the room: the wholly inefficient and inhumane global argibusiness. Indeed, what we’re rarely told is that many countries in the global south were largely self-sufficient in food production until the late 1970s.

In the 80s and 90s, however, the rise of the global “free trade” movement meant that many local farmers suddenly faced fierce competition from some of the world’s biggest food producers — companies which received vast subsidies from the U.S. government or E.U. and were thus able to produce huge food surpluses, which they them dumped on some of the world’s poorest countries at below-cost price.

The result was all too predictable: peasant farmers and small holders were priced out of the market and countries which had for centuries been self-sufficient in food production became wholly dependent on food imports — hence their stark vulnerability today to food price shocks.

The Privatization of Virtually Everything

The breakneck pace of privatisation of land and seeds in the last 30 years has massively enriched the political and economic elites of both the Northern and Southern hemispheres, at the expense of the general population. As much as 70 percent of the world’s seeds now belong to a handful of huge multinational conglomerates, granting them virtual control over the global food chain. Seeds, which for millenia have been a common good to be shared out and improved among small communities of farmers, are now almost the sole preserve of companies like Monsanto and Syngenta, which brings us to:

The GM Revolution

As global hunger rises, ever-greater pressure is being brought to bear on countries to embrace GM technologies — despite clear evidence of the risks they pose. [According to an international study from 2008, the industrialisation of agriculture, of which GM is a part, has led to the heavy use of artificial fertilisers and other chemicals. These have in turn harmed the soil structure and polluted water ways. What’s more, the leaching of the soil of essential minerals means food is less healthy than 60 years ago].

Perhaps most importantly, legitimate concerns remain about the impact on GM foods on human health. For this reason, countries across Europe including Germany, France, Switzerland and Greece continue to prohibit sales of GM food. But not so in Spain, where GM crops are routinely tested, grown and sold to unsuspecting consumers. [Indeed, Spain has more large-scale plantations of genetically modified seeds than any other country in the European Union (EU), accounting for 42 percent of all field trials of genetically modified crops in the EU, according to figures from the European Commission Joint Research Centre].

We Are What We Eat

Clearly, if we regularly consume GM products or food with high levels of pesticides, flavourings and chemical fertilizers, the long-term toll on our health will be heavy indeed. But despite what we are often told by Agribusiness representatives, there are alternatives out there. We can choose to buy healthier options such as local organic food, and in turn help to support local farmers. We can even develop our own urban allotments, as more and more city dwellers are choosing to do. The most important thing is not to descend into apathy and resignation, for that is precisely what the world’s major food corporations want.

For those of you who have made it this far and have a reasonable level of Spanish comprehension, here’s the interview in full:


18 thoughts on “Starving the World for Power and Profit: The Global Agribusiness Model

  1. […] Starving the Poor to Stuff the Rich: The Global Agri-Business Model […]

  2. nikitesoroni says:

    My God! I didn’t know about the GM here in Spain! It is a disaster! I did know they are not so healthy concern, you know, here is legal to use dangerous preservatives in the food (things forbidden since 30-20 years in Italy ) but this of the GM is even worst!
    What do you think about the new taxes rules for expats in Spain? Will the Costa Blanca become UK free for that? How much it will make the house market crisis even worst?

    • Don Quijones says:

      You’re right Nikitesoroni, it’s scary indeed. Who’s to say how much of what we eat here in Spain contians traces of GM products. Unfortunately, compared to most other European countries the level of public concern or awareness is woefully low. Few articles about GM foods make it into the newspapers and as for televised documentaries about the issue, forget about it! As regards the tax issue for British ex-pats I imagine that it will backfire terribly on the current government (as pretty much everything does these days). The unintended conseuqence will almost certainly be a mass exodus of British (and who knows, perhaps other European) expats understandably loath to declare all their oversees assets to Spanish authorities — especially given the depths of desperation Rajoy’s government is reaching! Anyway, thanks for commenting and look forward to speaking again, hopefully some time soon!

  3. Overall have to agree with everything here but just get fed up of seeing the overpopulation debate once again given validity where none is needed. The world is not over populated and never will be and as your piece eloquently says it is “inefficiencies of a global agribusiness model geared purely at generating ever larger profits for the handful of businesses”.

    Please read the below article to see how we will be losing population growth;

    Falling World Population and the New Economic Prosperity

    As recently as year 2000, forecasts by UN agencies for world population in year 2050 were typically in the range 10 to 12 billion. By 2100, the same forecasts projected world population at 15 billion or more. Today, even the more “natalist” UN projections and forecasts say that world population will be peaking at around 8 billion in 2050, then declining to about 6 billion by 2100, the population of 1998. Today’s population is about 7.1 billion.

    To be sure, these forecasts may be too “anti-natalist” but they show the intensity of global demographic change. Added to the well known and sometimes flagrant over-reporting of national populations, especially for aid receiving countries whose aid inflows are tied to their population number, the New Demographic Revolution is a major hope for the future, completely marginalising the previous and menacing “15 billion by 2100” forecasts.

    • Don Quijones says:

      Good comment UM. Couldn’r agree more. To be honest, my comment on the population issue was meant more as a caveat than anything else. I’m certainly not a Malthusian eugenicist!

      That said, I do believe that one of the biggest challenges for the generations to come will be overcoming the chronic shortages in some of the world’s most valuable resources, in particular oil and water.

      Btw, loved the piece from market oracle. It’s about time people started challenging this obsession with “over population.”

    • Steve says:

      I am sorry but I cannot let a comment go when you state “world population will be peaking at around 8 billion in 2050, then declining to about 6 billion by 2100” Can you really be saying that it is acceptable that there will be a decline in the population of 2 billion people in only 50 years?

      The only way that there can be a drop of such magnitude would be a disaster/war/famine on a scale never seen in human history.

      • Don Quijones says:

        Thanks for your comment Steve. FYI, the words you quoted came from a Market Oracle article. I agree with you that such a drop in population would be absolutely terrible and could only be the result of a huge calamity. What makes it much worse is that if the world’s resources were used more rationally and less wastefully, the problem of population would not be a problem at all. That is, after all, the basic thrust of the article.

        However, we live in a world that is manifestly unjust and where income and wealth inequalities continue to rise. Poverty in Europe, for example, is rising at a frightful rate.The question is: if we continue along this wayward path, could such a disaster occur? And in my opinion, the answer is yes.

  4. cgoodsthings says:

    Looks like the European Commission is set to make things even worse.

    “BREAKING: European Commission to criminalize nearly all seeds and plants not registered with government”

    I know a lot of news articles can exaggerate, hopefully that is the case here, as this seems to be a bit over the top. 😦

    • Don Quijones says:

      Great share cgoodsthings. Here’s another perspective on the new EC reforms:

      Not quite as bleak as the one you linked to, although it must be said that the onerous responsibilities placed on small farmers by yet another layer of red tape cannot be good news – especially for small-time conventional or organic farmers.

  5. niki says:

    “BREAKING: European Commission to criminalize nearly all seeds and plants not registered with government”
    I think it is true, already in Europe many old varieties of seeds are illegal. Actually, the seed savers work, many times is illegal.

  6. nikitesoroni says:

    Thanks for the link. At least we can go on cultivating our precious old varieties at home…
    If you like Italian or Indian food and you come around La Bisbal send a message and come to eat with us!

    • Don Quijones says:

      What a kind invitation. La Doña and I love the Emporda region, where we have a number of friends living. Next time we’re up there, I’ll give you a shout. Many thanks Niki!

      • nikitesoroni says:

        Welcome! With your (surely) nice Lady!
        By the way, we are two quite old, funny, wondering people, hope this will not discourage you guys…

      • Don Quijones says:

        On the contrary, it would be great to meet you. As they say, the older, the wiser…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: